legal implications of content moderation

Summary

Online platforms that allow users to post content face legal implications when moderating content, as outlined in the Communications Decency Act (CDA) and antitrust law. 1 Unilateral content moderation is protected under the CDA, but the U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled that platforms cannot sue for deceptive business practices, tortious interference with business and contractual relations, and false advertising under the Lanham Act. 2 This suggests that content moderation policies and practices may be subject to change in the future.

According to


See more results on Neeva


Summaries from the best pages on the web

Summary This article explores the legal implications of content moderation policies and practices under the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, and antitrust law. It considers unilateral content moderation decisions, followed by potential concerted conduct across platforms, and examines the current state of the law on the issue. It also looks at the potential for competition between platforms, such as Google, Facebook, and Apple, and looks at the potential for a new approach to the law.
The Law on Online Content Moderation and Where It's Headed
favIcon
jdsupra.com

The law requires social network companies to almost instantly take down material deemed “obviously illegal”, at risk of heavy fines and without judicial decision-making safeguards. After its...
The push for content moderation legislation around the world - Brookings
favIcon
brookings.edu

content moderation aligns with free speech concerns and its effect on users. While large media companies like Facebook tout the fact that they have brought on legal experts and heads…
Fordham Law Review - Fordham University
favIcon
fordham.edu

There is little doubt that content moderation serves a useful function; it helps prevent popular online platforms from serving as breeding grounds for the worst types of online behavior. Unfortunately,…
The Human Cost of Online Content Moderation - Harvard Journal of Law ...
favIcon
harvard.edu

Summary Online platforms that allow users to post content face a constant choice: to remove or to not remove, to police or not to police. This article explores the legal implications of content moderation policies and practices under the Communications Decency Act, or CDA, and antitrust law. Unilateral content moderation enjoys broad protection, but there are calls for change, as the U.S. Supreme Court has recently ruled that platforms cannot sue for deceptive business practices, tortious interference with business and contractual relations, and false advertising under the Lanham Act.
The Law on Online Content Moderation and Where It's Headed
favIcon
proskauer.com

The issue of content moderation is pervasive in our everyday lives. It affects the news we receive, our ability to share our opinions and ultimately alters our views and beliefs.…
Content Moderation – The Most Important Legal Issue of the New Decade
favIcon
progressivelawnetwork.org

The so-called Ending Support for Internet Censorship Act would require companies exceeding a certain amount of users or a certain threshold of annual revenue to get a certification from the…
The Thorny Problem of Content Moderation and Bias
favIcon
cdt.org

The content they are exposed to leaves them vulnerable to a number of different mental health issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder. Their work is often hidden from users and is…
“Community Guidelines”: The Legal Implications of Workplace Conditions ...
favIcon
fordhamlawreview.org

Platforms failure to take action against content that violates their policies or community standards has been the cause of recent content moderation controversies. We are increasingly seeing these play out…
Exploring the problems of content moderation on social media
favIcon
internetgovernance.org