Summary
Aurora offers more flexibility and scalability than RDS, and it is more cost-effective for smaller and more manageable applications.
1
It also provides two times throughput performance provided by PostgreSQL or five times the throughput provided by standard MySQL running on similar hardware.
2
Aurora’s performance is higher and more consistent.
2
According to
See more results on Neeva
Summaries from the best pages on the web
Summary
Amazon RDS and Amazon Aurora are two popular options for running relational databases in AWS. Aurora is a cloud-first database that splits the compute and storage into different pieces, and it is meant to be a drop-in replacement for RDS. Aurora offers more flexibility and scalability than RDS, and it is more cost-effective for smaller and more manageable applications.
Aurora vs. RDS: An Engineer's Guide to Choosing a Database - LWIA Blog
lastweekinaws.com
Here, we will be discussing Aurora Vs RDS. ... to use AWS Database Migration Service to migrate from EC2-hosted or on-premises databases such as PostgreSQL, ...
AWS Aurora Vs RDS: 5 Critical Factors
hevodata.com